Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 9;21(4):1591–1598. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03756

Table 1. Comparison of the Flory Radius (RF), Grafting Density, Distance between PEG Grafts (D), and Length/Thickness of the PEG Layer (L)a.

entry PEG Mw [g mol–1] chains [nm–2] RF [nm] D [nm] L [nm] PEG conformation
OVA   0        
OVA-PEG2k0.2 2000 0.18 3.4 2.7 3.9 mushroom–brush
OVA-PEG2k0.5 2000 0.54 3.4 1.5 5.7 mushroom–brush
OVA-PEG2k2.5 2000 2.47 3.4 0.7 9.4 dense brush
OVA-PEG3.4k0.2 3400 0.22 4.7 2.4 7.1 brush
OVA-PEG3.4k0.8 3400 0.83 4.7 1.2 11.1 dense brush
OVA-PEG5k0.2 5000 0.19 5.9 2.6 10.0 brush
a

These parameters were used to predict the PEG conformation according to the model of de Gennes.17 The interaction of PEG to nanocapsule surface cannot be quantified, and hence, it was not included in the calculation of the PEG conformation using the de Gennes model. We assume a homogeneous, not patchy, distribution of amino groups on the surface of OVA-NCs.