Table 1. Comparison of the Flory Radius (RF), Grafting Density, Distance between PEG Grafts (D), and Length/Thickness of the PEG Layer (L)a.
| entry | PEG Mw [g mol–1] | chains [nm–2] | RF [nm] | D [nm] | L [nm] | PEG conformation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OVA | 0 | |||||
| OVA-PEG2k0.2 | 2000 | 0.18 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 3.9 | mushroom–brush |
| OVA-PEG2k0.5 | 2000 | 0.54 | 3.4 | 1.5 | 5.7 | mushroom–brush |
| OVA-PEG2k2.5 | 2000 | 2.47 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 9.4 | dense brush |
| OVA-PEG3.4k0.2 | 3400 | 0.22 | 4.7 | 2.4 | 7.1 | brush |
| OVA-PEG3.4k0.8 | 3400 | 0.83 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 11.1 | dense brush |
| OVA-PEG5k0.2 | 5000 | 0.19 | 5.9 | 2.6 | 10.0 | brush |
These parameters were used to predict the PEG conformation according to the model of de Gennes.17 The interaction of PEG to nanocapsule surface cannot be quantified, and hence, it was not included in the calculation of the PEG conformation using the de Gennes model. We assume a homogeneous, not patchy, distribution of amino groups on the surface of OVA-NCs.