Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 12;31(5):2701–2719. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa384

Table 1.

Learn phase behavioral results

Proportion of Approach Responses
Omnibus 2 × 2 ANOVA
Effect DOF F P ηG2 [95% CIs]
Valence (Positive vs. Negative) 1, 19 1667.99 <0.001* 0.92 [0.0000017, 0.0082]
Presentation (1–16) 1, 19 1.76 0.04* 0.04 [0.011, 0.045]
Valence × Presentation 15, 285 122.227 <0.001* 0.65 [0.01, 0.045]
Post hoc pairwise comparisons at each presentation
Pair DOF t P d [95% CIs]
Positive versus Negative at Presentation 1 19 1.99 0.063 0.2 [−0.632, 0.632]
Positive versus Negative at Presentation 2–16 19 All ≥ 3.58 All ≤ 0.0032* All ≥ 0.99 [−0.6295 to −0.6234, 0.623–0.655]
Response Time
Omnibus 2 × 2 ANOVA
Effect DOF F P ηG2 [95% CIs]
Valence (Positive vs. Negative) 1, 19 3.27 0.083 0.0017 [0.000001345, 0.0062]
Presentation (1–16) 1, 19 57.95 <0.001* 0.54 [0.0078, 0.0338]
Valence × Presentation 15, 285 1.36 0.175 0.0042 [0.008, 0.034]

Note: All post hoc P-values are Holm–Bonferroni corrected. *p < 0.05.