Table 1.
Proportion of Approach Responses | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Omnibus 2 × 2 ANOVA | ||||
Effect | DOF | F | P | ηG2 [95% CIs] |
Valence (Positive vs. Negative) | 1, 19 | 1667.99 | <0.001* | 0.92 [0.0000017, 0.0082] |
Presentation (1–16) | 1, 19 | 1.76 | 0.04* | 0.04 [0.011, 0.045] |
Valence × Presentation | 15, 285 | 122.227 | <0.001* | 0.65 [0.01, 0.045] |
Post hoc pairwise comparisons at each presentation | ||||
Pair | DOF | t | P | d [95% CIs] |
Positive versus Negative at Presentation 1 | 19 | 1.99 | 0.063 | 0.2 [−0.632, 0.632] |
Positive versus Negative at Presentation 2–16 | 19 | All ≥ 3.58 | All ≤ 0.0032* | All ≥ 0.99 [−0.6295 to −0.6234, 0.623–0.655] |
Response Time | ||||
Omnibus 2 × 2 ANOVA | ||||
Effect | DOF | F | P | ηG2 [95% CIs] |
Valence (Positive vs. Negative) | 1, 19 | 3.27 | 0.083 | 0.0017 [0.000001345, 0.0062] |
Presentation (1–16) | 1, 19 | 57.95 | <0.001* | 0.54 [0.0078, 0.0338] |
Valence × Presentation | 15, 285 | 1.36 | 0.175 | 0.0042 [0.008, 0.034] |
Note: All post hoc P-values are Holm–Bonferroni corrected. *p < 0.05.