Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 4;113(4):462–470. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa116

Table 2.

RRs to BMI (<25 and ≥25 kg/m2) in patients receiving abemaciclib + ET and placebo + ET

RRs Abemaciclib + ET Placebo + ET
(n = 757)
(n = 381)
BMI <25 kg/m2 BMI ≥25 kg/m2 OR (95% CI) P a BMI <25 kg/m2 BMI <25 kg/m2 OR (95% CI) P a
No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%)
Best overall response 351 (46.4) 406 (53.6) 172 (45.1) 209 (54.9)
 CR 6 (1.8) 17 (4.5) 2 (1.2) 0 (0)
 PR 155 (47.6) 140 (37.1) 33 (19.9) 61 (30.7)
 Stable disease 145 (44.5) 189 (50.1) 104 (62.7) 108 (54.3)
 PD 20 (6.1) 31 (8.2) 27 (16.3) 30 15.1)
 NE 25 29 6 10
ORR (CR + PR) 161 (49.4) 157 (41.6) 0.73 (0.54 to 0.99) .04 35 (21.1) 61 (30.7) 1.65 (1.02 to 2.67) .04
Clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + Stable disease) 306 (93.9) 346 (91.8) 0.73 (0.41 to 1.31) .28 139 (83.7) 169 (84.9) 1.09 (0.62 to 1.93) .76
a

P values are from the χ2 test (all statistical tests were 2-sided). BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; CR = complete response; ET = endocrine therapy; NE = nonevaluable; OR = odds ratio; ORR = overall response rate; PR = partial response; RR = response rate.