TABLE 4.
n | Baseline | Δ at 12 mo, % | Δ at 24 mo, % | P change2 | P trend2 | P ANCOVA3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body weight, kg | |||||||
Equol producers | 14 | 88.2 (80.6, 95.8)4,5,6 | 2.6 (1.3, 3.9) | 3.1 (1.1, 5.1) | 0.002 | 0.007 | <0.001 |
Low-equol producers | 15 | 84.3 (78.5, 90.8) 4,6,7 | 1.1 (–1.5, 3.6) | 3.4 (0.4, 6.3) | 0.018 | 0.020 | |
Nonequol producers | 8 | 81.0 (67.3, 94.8)4,5,7 | –0.04 (–2.9, 2.8) | 1.2 (–1.9, 4.3) | 0.479 | 0.401 | |
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg | |||||||
Equol producers | 13 | 140.2 (127.0, 153.3) | –3.6 (–10.5, 3.2) | –3.9 (–12.5, 4.8) | 0.287 | 0.221 | 0.252 |
Low-equol producers | 12 | 128.3 (116.5, 140.2) | –0.3 (–7.7, 7.2) | 3.1 (–2.9, 9.2) | 0.416 | 0.166 | |
Nonequol producers | 10 | 136.8 (126.5, 147.1) | –6.7 (–13.3, –0.1) | –8.2 (–14.4, –1.9) | 0.023 | 0.014 | |
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg | |||||||
Equol producers | 118 | 82.3 (76.3, 88.3) | –3.4 (–9.5, 2.6) | –3.2 (–10.2, 3.9) | 0.281 | 0.200 | 0.133 |
Low-equol producers | 119 | 76.8 (69.6, 83.9) | –2.1 (–9.8, 5.5) | 1.1 (–5.2, 7.4) | 0.871 | 0.819 | |
Nonequol producers | 88 | 82.2 (75.7, 88.7) | –4.8 (–11.0, 1.3) | –9.1 (–13.4, 1.2) | 0.022 | 0.018 |
Values are means (95% CIs). Equol producers were defined as subjects with serum equol >20 ng/mL and low-producers as subjects with serum equol (2–20 ng/mL), whereas nonproducers had undetectable serum equol.
One-way repeated-measures ANOVA of change over time.
ANCOVA for difference in percentage change from baseline between the 3 groups at 24 mo, with age, height, and (for blood pressure only) weight at baseline as covariates.
P < 0.001; ANCOVA with age and height as covariates for difference among the three groups.
P < 0.001 for difference between equol producers and nonequol producers (ANCOVA with age and height as covariates).
P < 0.001 for difference between equol producers and low-equol producers (ANCOVA with age and height as covariates).
P = 0.455 for difference between low-equol producers nonequol producers (ANCOVA with age and height as covariates).
Two far outliers identified by the Grubbs test were omitted from the analysis; these outlier subjects did not have systolic blood pressure values that were outliers.
One far outlier identified by the Grubbs test was omitted from the analysis; this outlier subject did not have a systolic blood pressure value that was an outlier.