Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 18;3(4):227–233. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-21-0013

Table 2.

Results of Univariate and Multivariate Linear Regression Analyses Assessing Associations Between Serum Uric Acid Concentrations at Baseline and the PEP/ET Ratio, NT-proBNP Concentrations, and the baPWV Measured at Baseline and at the End of the Study Period

Outcome variable Crude AdjustedA
Total R2
(×10−1)
Standardized
coefficient
(×10−1)
Non-standardized
coefficient
(×10−1; 95% CI)
P value Total R2
(×10−1)
Standardized
coefficient
(×10−1)
Non-standardized
coefficient
(×10−1; 95% CI)
P value
PEP/ET ratio
 At baseline 0.04 0.69 0.03 (0.01, 0.04) <0.01 1.4 0.73 0.03 (0.01, 0.05) <0.01
 At the end of the study 0.08 0.93 0.04 (0.02, 0.06) <0.01 1.0 0.60 0.02 (0.01, 0.04) 0.01
Log [NT-proBNP]
 At baseline 0.04 −0.62 −0.43 (−0.69, 0.17) <0.01 1.7 −0.48 −0.33 (−0.63, 0.03) 0.03
 At the end of the study −0.05 −0.08 −0.05 (−0.33, 0.23) 0.72 0.14 0.53
baPWV
 At baseline 0.05 0.76 1.2 (0.6, 1.8) <0.01 4.9 0.71 1.1 (0.56, 1.6) <0.01
 At the end of the study 0.1 1.0 1.7 (1.0, 2.5) <0.01 3.8 0.81 1.3 (0.72, 2.0) <0.01

AAdjusted for age, BMI, SBP, heart rate, HbA1c, serum LDL-C, current smoking, amount of drinking, and past medical history of hyperuricemia at baseline. CI, confidence interval; [NT-proBNP], serum NT-proBNP concentration. Other abbreviations as in Table 1.