Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 27;2021:8890808. doi: 10.1155/2021/8890808

Table 5.

Comparison with existing on HMDB51 and UCF101.

HMDB51 UCF101
Methods Accuracy (%) Methods Accuracy (%)
IDT [12] 57.2 IDT [12] 85.9
ST [25] 58.9 C3D [11] 85.2
STMS [26] 58.2 Two-stream CNN [27] 88.0
Two-stream CNN [27] 59.4 TDD [30] 90.3
TDD [30] 63.2 MSR-CNN [10] 93.7
MSR-CNN [10] 66.9 T-CNN [32] 87.5
STT [33] 65.2 STT [33] 92.2
Three-stream CNN [29] 68.5 Three-stream CNN [29] 93.4
LTC [35] 64.8 LTC [35] 91.7
TSN (two modalities) [34] 68.5 TSN (two modalities) [34] 94.0
DANet-50 [39] 54.3 DANet-50 [39] 86.7
STA-CNN [42] 71.5 STA-CNN [42] 93.8
SAM [41] 69.1 SAM [41] 94.3
STAN [40] STAN [40] 93.6
ATEN (two modalities) 70.6 ATEN (two modalities) 94.5