Table 5.
Comparison with existing on HMDB51 and UCF101.
| HMDB51 | UCF101 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Methods | Accuracy (%) | Methods | Accuracy (%) |
| IDT [12] | 57.2 | IDT [12] | 85.9 |
| ST [25] | 58.9 | C3D [11] | 85.2 |
| STMS [26] | 58.2 | Two-stream CNN [27] | 88.0 |
| Two-stream CNN [27] | 59.4 | TDD [30] | 90.3 |
| TDD [30] | 63.2 | MSR-CNN [10] | 93.7 |
| MSR-CNN [10] | 66.9 | T-CNN [32] | 87.5 |
| STT [33] | 65.2 | STT [33] | 92.2 |
| Three-stream CNN [29] | 68.5 | Three-stream CNN [29] | 93.4 |
| LTC [35] | 64.8 | LTC [35] | 91.7 |
| TSN (two modalities) [34] | 68.5 | TSN (two modalities) [34] | 94.0 |
| DANet-50 [39] | 54.3 | DANet-50 [39] | 86.7 |
| STA-CNN [42] | 71.5 | STA-CNN [42] | 93.8 |
| SAM [41] | 69.1 | SAM [41] | 94.3 |
| STAN [40] | — | STAN [40] | 93.6 |
| ATEN (two modalities) | 70.6 | ATEN (two modalities) | 94.5 |