Table 3.

Sensitivity analysis of percentage reduction in TB prevalence and M:F ratios sampling from restricted regions of the posterior. ‘L’, ‘M’, and ‘U’ correspond to different elliptical regions shown top-right in Fig. 4. ($\rho$—assortativity, $\pi$—differential detection, $\alpha$—differential progression).

Outcome	Parameter pair	Ethiopia			Uganda
		L	M	U	L	M	U
Prevalence	$\pi$, $\alpha$	0.9 (0.5, 1.4)	0.5 (0.3, 0.8)	0.1 ($-0.04$, 0.2)	10 (7, 15)	9 (6, 11)	7 (5, 9)
	$\rho$, $\alpha$	0.8 ($-0.3$, 3)	0.6 ($-0.3$, 3)	0.6 ($-0.2$, 0.3)	9 (4, 15)	8 (3, 13)	8 (3, 13)
	$\rho$, $\pi$	0.9 (0.3, 1.8)	0.4 (0.04, 1.1)	0.1 (0, 0.3)	10 (7, 13)	9 (6, 12)	7 (5, 9)
TB M:F ratio	$\pi$, $\alpha$	11 (9, 14)	6 (5, 8)	1 ($-0.5$, 3)	24 (20, 27)	21 (17, 24)	17 (14, 20)
	$\rho$, $\alpha$	6 ($-9$, 21)	5 ($-11$, 19)	6 ($-9$, 21)	21 (12, 30)	20 (8, 29)	20 (9, 29)
	$\rho$, $\pi$	11 (8, 14)	6 (4, 9)	1.5 ($-1.3$, 4)	23 (19, 28)	20 (17, 24)	18 (14, 21)