Table 2.
Example completion of the FRAME-IS
| FRAME-IS module or sub-component | Example completion |
|---|---|
| Module 1 | |
| The EBP being implemented is: | Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) |
| The implementation strategy being modified is: | Training program for lay health workers to enhance parent engagement in PCIT |
| The modification(s) being made is/are: |
- Tailoring of training content (e.g., language) to local context to fit population differences - Removal of the behavioral coding component of the training |
| The reason(s) for the modification(s) is/are: | - Improve appropriateness/feasibility |
| Module 2 | |
| What is modified? |
- Content (details provided in Module 3) - Context (setting, based on transition from Miami to California) |
| Module 3 | |
| What is the nature of the content, evaluation, or training modification? |
- Tailoring (modifying language) - Removing/skipping elements (specifically, removal of behavioral coding training component) |
| OPTIONAL: what is the relationship to core elements? | - Unknown |
| Module 4 | |
| What is the goal? | - Increase the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the implementation effort |
| What is the level of the rationale for the modification? | - Practitioner and Patient level (address cultural and linguistic differences for a population of predominantly Mexican descent) |
| Module 5 | |
| When is the modification initiated? | - Pre-implementation/planning/pilot phase |
| Is the modification planned? | - Planned/proactive |
| Module 6 | |
| Who participates in the decision to modify? | - Researcher, program leader, and clinicians (lay health workers) |
| OPTIONAL: Who makes the ultimate decision? | - Researchers |
| Module 7 | |
| How widespread is the modification? | - Network system/community (listed modifications were applied for entire California rollout) |