Table 4.

Quality assessment of non-systematic reviews using SANRA.

Review	Justification of the article's importance for the readership	Statement of concrete aims or formulation of questions	Description of the literature search	Referencing	Scientific reasoning	Appropriate presentation of data	Total
Brando et al. (2017)	2	2	2	2	2	1	11
Dove and Astell (2017)	2	2	2	2	2	2	12
Klimova and Maresova (2017)	2	2	2	2	1	1	10
Lorenz et al. (2019)	1	2	1	2	2	2	10
Neubauer et al. (2018)	2	2	2	1	2	2	11
Rathnayake et al. (2019)	2	2	2	2	2	2	12
Yousaf et al. (2019)	2	2	2	2	2	2	12
Total	13	14	13	13	13	12

Scores: 0–2 (Baethge et al., 2019).