Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 10;100(5):101036. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101036

Table 13.

Effects of dietary valine and isoleucine concentrations on significant responses in feed intakes of laying hens.

Basis Reference Age (weeks) Breed Valine (g/kg) Dietary energy (MJ/kg) Response (g/bird/d)
Total Harms and Russell (2001) 39- Hy-Line W36 5.3 vs. 7.0 12.22 vs. 11.88 81 vs. 96
Azzam et al. (2015) 40-47 Hy-Line brown 9.0 vs. 11.0 11.31 115 vs. 110
Wen et al. (2019b) 41-60 Hy-Line W36 5.2 vs. 7.3 12.46 67 vs. 93
Digestible Lelis et al. (2014) 42-54 Dekalb Brown 5.6 vs. 6.6 12.35 NS
Bregendahl et al. (2008) 28-34 Hy-Line W36 4.7 vs. 8.8 12.51 54 vs. 87
Basis Reference Age (weeks) Breed Isoleucine (g/kg) Dietary energy (MJ/kg) Response (g/bird/day)
Total Harms and Russell (2000a) 32-38 Hy-Line W36 4.9 vs. 6.7 12.09 vs. 11.70 NS
Peganova and Eder (2002) 28-33 Lohmann brown 6.9 vs. 8.1 11.44 102 vs. 87
Peganova and Eder (2002) 24-33 Lohmann brown 4.3 vs. 10.5 11.44 117 vs. 88
Peganov, and Eder (2002) 46-54 Lohmann brown 5.1 vs. 10.5 11.44 115 vs. 97
Shivazad et al. (2002) 37-43 Hy-Line W36 3.9 vs. 5.7 12.31 vs. 11.99 70 vs. 91
Rocha et al. (2013a) 24-40 Hy-Line W36 5.9 vs. 8.0 12.20 NS
Dong et al. (2016) 29-40 Lohmann brown 5.4 vs. 9.4 11.26 NS
Parenteau et al. (2020) 20-27 White Shaver 6.0 vs. 7.5 11.72 NS
Parenteau et al. (2020) 20-27 White Shaver 5.7 vs. 6.4 11.72 116 vs. 110
Digestible Bregendahl et al. (2008) 28-34 Hy-Line W36 3.7 vs. 6.4 12.51 56 vs. 85

Abbreviation: NS, nonsignificant.