Table 2.

Performance comparison in terms of PCE and bending durability (test conditions and result) of our PSC with previously reported ITO‐free flexible PSCs

			Cyclic Flex Test				Ref.
Year	Electrode Type	Electrode Architecture	PCE [%]	Bending Radius [mm]	Bending cycles	PCEfinal/PCEinitial [%]
2020	CNT	SWNT‐embedded PI	15.2	0.5	10 000	100	This work
2015	CNT	PET/SWNT/HNO3	5.38	10	N/A	85.5	[ 30 ]
2017	CNT	PEN/SWNT/MoO3	11	4	2,000	90	[ 20 ]
2020	Graphene	PET/EG‐Graphene	12.6	9	1,000	92.2	[ 56 ]
2018	Graphene	PDMS/Graphene	15	4	1,000	<80	[ 57 ]
2018	Graphene	PDMS/Graphene	18.2	4	5,000	43	[ 58 ]
2018	Graphene	PDMS/TFSA‐Graphene	17.5	4	5,000	≈35	[ 58 ]
2018	Graphene, CNT	Graphene, CSCNTs	11.9	4	2,000	84	[ 59 ]
2018	Graphene	PET/Graphene	13.94	4	1,000	≈92	[ 59 ]
2017	Graphene	PET/APTES/Graphene	17.9	4	100	>90	[ 59 ]
2016	Graphene	PEN/Graphene/MoO3	16.8	2	5,000	85	[ 39 ]
2019	PEDOT:PSS	PEDOT:PSS	19	3	5,000	≈80	[ 39 ]
2019	PEDOT:PSS	PEDOT:PSS	17.03	0.5	10,000	100	[ 12 ]
2019	PEDOT:PSS	PEDOT:PSS	20.25	2	5,000	97	[ 60 ]
2015	PEDOT:PSS	PEDOT:PSS	10.83	1	1,000	0.9	[ 61 ]
2019	AgNW	AgNW/PEDOT:PSS	15.06	5	1,000	80	[ 62 ]
2017	AgNW	a‐AZO/AgNW/AZO	11.23	12.5	400	94	[ 63 ]
2016	Metal grid	Ag grid/PET	14	5	5,000	95.4	[ 64 ]
2020	Metal grid	PI/Cu grid/Graphene	16.4	5	10,000	97	[ 65 ]
2019	Oxide/Metal/Oxide	TiO2/Ag/TiO2	13.00	1	1,000	97.6	[ 18 ]
2019	Oxide/Metal/Oxide	TiO2/Ag/TiO2	13.19	<1 (single folding)	50	85.3	[ 16 ]
				<1 (dual folding)	10	67.2