Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Crit Care. 2016 Jul 16;36:154–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.07.010

Table 2.

Psychosocial Resiliency and Emotion Domains of Neuro-ICU Patients and their Informal Caregivers

Patients Caregivers Comparison
M (SD) Nmissing Range M (SD) Nmissing Range t df r
Resiliency Factors
 Mindfulness 33.90 (5.47) 10 19 – 45 34.01 (5.12) 12 20 – 43 0.19 70 .02
 Coping 32.53 (9.20) 12 11 – 52 32.86 (8.92) 12 14 – 51 −0.14 69 .14
 Intimate Bond 40.49 (9.82) 13 0 – 64 38.64 (7.23) 15 21 – 59 −1.27 68 .21
 General Self-Efficacy 32.88 (5.27) 3 17 – 40
 Caregiving Self-Efficacy 83.68 (15.45) 5 37.33 – 100
Emotion Domains
 Distress 4.70 (3.28)a 4 0 – 10 4.46 (3.22)a 5 0 – 10 1.42 77 .12
 Anxiety 5.07 (3.39)a 4 0 – 10 5.19 (3.09)a 5 0 – 10 0.25 77 .05
 Depression 3.40 (3.02)b 4 0 – 10 2.62 (2.85)b 4 0 – 10 2.83* 78 .15
 Anger 2.81 (3.09)b 4 0 – 10 1.60 (2.14)c 4 0 – 8 3.59** 78 .08
% Meeting Clinical Cut-Off N % N % χ2 df
ET4 Total ≥ 15 44 50.6 42 42.4 1.37 1
*

p < .01

**

p < .001

Note. Resiliency factors include: Mindfulness = CAMS-R, Coping = MOCS-A, Intimate Bond = IBM, General Self-Efficacy = GSES, Caregiving Self-Efficacy = CSES-R; Emotion Domains include: Distress, Anxiety, Depression, and Anger = Emotion Thermometers (ET4). Emotion domain means that do not share the same superscripts differ from each other at p < .01 within patient and caregiver sample.