Table 1.
Probing of Hg2+ ion in actual water samples (river, lake, and well water) spiked with various concentrations of Hg2+ ion by the designed paper sensor
Sample | Amount added [× 10−6 m] | Amount found [× 10−6 m] | Recovery [%] | RSD [n = 3, %] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Well water | ||||
1 | 20 | 20.5 | 102.5 | 2.45 |
2 | 50 | 51.5 | 103 | 1.14 |
3 | 100 | 113.31 | 113.31 | 4.28 |
River water | ||||
1 | 20 | 16.8 | 84 | 0.57 |
2 | 50 | 45.9 | 91.8 | 4.1 |
3 | 100 | 96.4 | 96.4 | 9.64 |
Lake water | ||||
1 | 20 | 17.7 | 88.5 | 3.52 |
2 | 50 | 50.7 | 101.4 | 0.48 |
3 | 100 | 89.10 | 89.1 | 2.72 |