Table 1.
Cell culture technique | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Spheroids | Easy handling and user-friendly | Unable to mimic complex architecture |
Easy to transfer to different plates for subculture and for further studies | ||
HTS can be performed | ||
Can be co-cultured | ||
Can be reproduced easily | ||
Organoids and organ-on-a-chip | Specific for disease and patient | Can be variable |
Mimics in vivo complexity and cellular architecture | Less susceptible for HTS | |
Can provide in vivo like microenvironment | Difficult to achieve in vivo maturity | |
Also provides chemical and physical gradients | ||
Scaffolds/hydrogels | Can be done on microplates | Simple architecture |
HTS can be performed | Can be greatly variable | |
Can be easily reproduced | ||
Can be co-cultured | ||
3D printing | Custom-made features and architecture | Deficiency of vasculature |
Mimics chemical and physical gradients | Difficulty in procurement of raw materials for printing | |
Can be easily produced on a large scale | Less susceptible to HTS | |
Co-culture can be performed | Tissue maturity levels cannot be studied |
HTS=High-throughput screening, 3D=Three dimensional