Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 7;7(15):eabe4166. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe4166

Fig. 4. Comparison with other tools.

Fig. 4

(A) Comparison of RXNMapper, Mappet (16), and the original Indigo mapping from the USPTO dataset (281 reactions). The error bars show the Wilson confidence interval (59). (B) Mapping speed comparison between RXNMapper and Indigo (17), which is orders of magnitude faster than Mappet (16). For Indigo of 500 ms, we set a timeout of 500 ms, after which the tool would return an incomplete mapping. We averaged the timing on the imbalanced reactions for Indigo without timeout on 20k reactions.