Table 6.

DK’s accuracy on the eye-tracking tasks, and thematic prediction and integration scores derived from performance of sentence-picture matching tasks administer at pre- and post- passive and object cleft treatment. Significant differences between DK’s data and the control group (Crawford-Howell t-test; significance levels:

	DK pre-tx	DK post-tx	Healthy Control Participants†
			Mean (SD)
Accuracy (%, Comprehension)
Active	96	100
Passive	96	100
Subject-cleft	83	75
Object-cleft	4	8
Accuracy (%, Production)
Active	7	46#
Passive	54	71#
Eye movements (Comprehension)
Passive sentence processing
Prediction (V region)	0.41	0.5	0.40 (0.10)
Integration (N2 region)	0.29*	0.33*	0.66 (0.10)
Integration (S End region)	0.82	0.75	0.90 (0.14)
Object cleft sentence processing
Prediction (N1)	0.44	0.37
Integration (V + S End)	0.18	0.15

^*p< .05), as well as between pre- and post-treatment (mixed-effect logistic regression; significance levels:

^#p<.05) are indicated.

^†Data from Mack and Thompson (2017).