Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurocase. 2020 Dec 30;27(1):39–56. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2020.1862241

Table 7.

Results of the nonparametric voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis comparing DK’s gray matter maps at each time point to a control group (N=76). The Table shows significant clusters at a cluster-level threshold of p<.001, FWE-corrected (p<.05), with labels derived from Harvard-Oxford atlas (Desikan et al., 2006).

Pre- Passive Treatment Post- Passive Treatment

Cluster Size Pseudo-t Peak coordinates
Peak Region Extent L/R Cluster Size Pseudo-t Peak coordinates
Peak Region Extent L/R
x y z x y z
557 5.92 −30 2 −20 Amygdala Hippocampus, Parahippocampal anterior L 758 6.85 −29 0 −18 Amygdala Hippocampus, Parahippocampal anterior, Insula, Temporal Pole L
Pre- Cleft Treatment Post- Cleft Treatment

Cluster Size Pseudo-t Peak coordinates
Peak Region Extent L/R Cluster Size Pseudo-t Peak coordinates
Peak Region Extent L/R
x y z x y z

1899 6.85 −26 −10 −24 Hippocampus Parahippocampal anterior, Temporal Pole, Caudate, Insula, Amygdala, Putamen, Accumbens, Planum Polare L 1663 7.58 −26 −6 −21 Amygdala Hippocampus, Parahippocampal anterior, Putamen, Accumbens, Insula, Temporal Pole, Temporal Fusiform anterior, Planum Polare L
240 5.63 −14 12 12 Caudate Accumbens L
467 5.14 27 −4 −24 Amygdala Hippocampus, Parahippocampal anterior, Temporal Pole R