Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 7;11:7561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86888-7

Table 2.

Comparison of clinicopathological features of patients with enriched ECM and low ECM gene signature using Pearson’s chi-square analysis (TCGA-KIRC dataset).

Clinical parameter High ECM (n = 255) Low ECM (n = 255) Pearson χ2 p-value Clinical parameter High ECM (n = 255) Low ECM (n = 255) Pearson χ2 p-value
Age 1 Fraction genome altered  < 0.01*
 < 66 years 128 128  < 0.120 108 150
 > 66 years 127 127  > 0.120 147 105
Ethnicity  < 0.01* OS 0.05
African American 36 19  < 5 years 191 171
Caucasian 213 227  > 5 years 64 84
Sex 0.51 OS status  < 0.01*
Female 89 96 Living 150 192
Male 166 159 Deceased 105 63
Stage  < 0.01* PFS  < 0.02
I + II 132 171  < 5 years 206 185
III + IV 123 84  > 5 years 49 70
Lymph Node 0.059 PFS Status  < 0.01*
N0 117 111 No progression 153 199
N1 12 4 Progression 102 56
Metastasis  < 0.01* DSS 0.05
No Metastasis M0 188 213  < 5 years 191 171
Metastasis M1 51 27  > 5 years 64 84
Aneuploidy score  < 0.01* DSS status  < 0.01*
 > 4 143 81 Tumor free 172 221
 < 4 112 174 Dead with tumor 76 31