Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 8;10:68. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-00933-8

Table 3.

PsA resistance risk factors for clinical outcomes

Citation, study design, location N C/T Patient/infection description Analysis Variable Proportion of patients with either outcome with variable p-value

Rodriguez-Nunez et al. 2019 [28]

Retrospective, multicenter

International

90 Drug-resistant PsA RTIs (76.7% XDR; 23.3% MDR) Univariate regression XDR PsA infection

Survivors

(N = 65)

Non-survivors

(N = 25)

.308

73.8%

(48/65)

84.0%

(21/25)

Diaz-Cañestro et al. 2018 [30]

Prospective,

single center

Spain

58 PsA (86.2% XDR; 10.3% MDR) infections, including RTIs (60.3%), UTIs (17.2%), and IAIs (6.9%) Univariate regression

Clinical

cure

(N = 35)

Clinical failure (N = 21)
Resistance profile .045
XDR PsA infection

82.8%

(29/35)

100.0%

(21/21)

MDR PsA infection

17.1%

(6/35)

0.0%

(0/21)

p-value < 0.05 indicates a significant difference are shown in bold

C/T: Ceftolozane/tazobactam; IAI: Intra-abdominal infection; MDR: Multidrug-resistant; PsA: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; RTI: Respiratory tract infection; UTI: Urinary tract infection; XDR: Extensively-drug-resistant