Skip to main content
. 2020 May 28;35(3):825–830. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-0971-4

Table 1.

Demographic features and ocular characteristics of patients with nanophthalmos.

Mean (SD) Min – Max
Age (years) 48.76 (15.99) 5–74
Gender, n (%)
  Female 80 (55.6)
Laterality, n (%)
  Bilateral 93 (64.6)
Mode of referral, n (%)
  Decreased vision 106 (73.6)
  Pain 1 (0.7)
  Routine evaluation 35 (24.3)
  Others 2 (1.4)
LogMAR UCVAa 1.30 1.08–1.78
LogMAR BCVAa 0.78 0.48–1.18
Spherical equivalenta (Dioptres) 10.0 5.7–12.5
Axial length (mm) 17.64 (1.74) 14.5–20.5
RCS thickness (mm) 1.99 (0.25) 1.7–3.4
Lens thickness (mm) 4.27 (0.70) 2.0–5.9
IOP (mmHg) 18.38 (9.38) 5.0–66.0
ACD (mm) 2.71 (0.64) 1.5–4.1
IOL power (Dioptres) 38.15 (11.80) 20.0–74.0
Lens status, n (%)
  Phakic 215 (92.7)
  PCIOL 14 (6.0)
  Aphakic 3 (1.3)
Gonioscopy, n (%)
  Closed 110 (65.5)
  Closed with synechiae 39 (23.2)
  Open 19 (11.3)
Peripheral iridotomy
  Present, n (%) 101 (69.2)

RCS retinochoroidoscleral, IOP intraocular pressure, ACD anterior chamber depth, UCVA uncorrected visual acuity, BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, IOL intraocular lens.

alogMAR UCVA, logMAR BCVA, spherical equivalent were presented as median and interquartile range.