Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 7;78(7):1–13. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0326

Table 3. Secondary Outcomes and Hypothesized Mediators.

Outcome SlowMo groupa TAU groupa Adjusted mean difference (SE) [95% CI]b P value
Mean (SD) Participants, No, Mean (SD) Participants, No.
WEMWBS scorec
Baseline 39.3 (9.1) 179 40.5 (8.7) 175 NA NA
12 wk 42.2 (9.4) 164 41.6 (9.1) 157 1.56 (0.89) [−0.18 to 3.30] .08
24 wk 43.3 (11.0) 157 41.2 (9.6) 165 2.82 (0.89) [1.08 to 4.56] .001
PSWQ score
Baseline 56.9 (10.8) 179 56.6 (10.1) 175 NA NA
12 wk 53.2 (11.6) 158 55.4 (11.5) 157 −2.81 (0.90) [−4.57 to −1.04] .002
24 wk 52.2 (11.6) 154 54.5 (11.5) 163 −2.24 (0.90) [−4.00 to −0.48] .01
BCSS negative self score
Baseline 9.9 (5.8) 181 10.3 (5.5) 178 NA NA
12 wk 9.0 (6.0) 162 10.0 (6.0) 159 −0.98 (0.48) [−1.92 to −0.04] .04
24 wk 8.4 (5.9) 160 9.7 (5.8) 167 −1.19 (0.48) [−2.12 to −0.25] .01
BCSS positive self scorec
Baseline 10.7 (5.6) 181 10.8 (5.4) 178 NA NA
12 wk 11.5 (5.6) 164 11.5 (5.6) 159 0.33 (0.41) [−0.48 to 1.13] .43
24 wk 12.5 (5.5) 159 11.6 (5.8) 168 1.11 (0.41) [0.31 to 1.92] .006
BCSS negative other score
Baseline 13.3 (6.1) 181 13.3 (5.8) 178 NA NA
12 wk 12.9 (6.1) 163 13.0 (6.0) 159 −0.21 (0.55) [−1.30 to 0.88] .70
24 wk 12.6 (6.2) 159 12.7 (6.3) 168 −0.16 (0.55) [−1.25 to 0.92] .77
BCSS positive other scorec
Baseline 11.6 (5.2) 180 11.1 (4.9) 177 NA NA
12 wk 12.2 (5.1) 164 11.8 (4.8) 159 0.28 (0.42) [−0.55 to 1.12] .50
24 wk 12.4 (4.8) 158 12.1 (4.8) 168 0.34 (0.42) [−0.49 to 1.17] .42
MANSA scorec
Baseline 46.8 (9.9) 161 48.1 (10.2) 164 NA NA
12 wk 48.1 (10.7) 145 48.9 (10.6) 146 0.76 (0.91) [−1.02 to 2.55] .40
24 wk 50.5 (11.7) 135 49.1 (9.5) 148 2.75 (0.92) [0.94 to 4.55] .003
Possibility of being mistaken (0%-100%)c
Baseline 34.6 (30.9) 181 35.1 (31.0) 180 NA NA
12 wk 48.9 (32.2) 165 39.9 (33.2) 161 9.02 (3.16) [2.83 to 15.21] .004
24 wk 45.3 (31.8) 161 37.7 (31.1) 172 8.88 (3.16) [2.70 to 15.07] .005
Possibility of being mistaken, No. yes/no (% yes/% no)c
Baseline 105/76 (58/42) NA 106/74 (59/41) NA NA NA
12 wk 124/41 (75/25) NA 100/61 (62/38) NA 3.83 (1.53 to 9.59)d .004
24 wk 105/56 (65/35) NA 100/72 (58/42) NA 2.01 (0.86 to 4.70)d .11
Alternative explanations, No. yes/no (% yes/% no)c
Baseline 79/102 (44/56) NA 85/94 (48/52) NA NA NA
12 wk 90/74 (55/45) NA 78/83 (48/52) NA 1.74 (0.90 to 3.36)d .10
24 wk 87/73 (54/46) NA 87/82 (52/48) NA 1.33 (0.70 to 2.55)d .39
JTC version 85:15, No. yes/no (% yes/% no)
Baseline 103/77 (57/43) NA 83/96 (46/54) NA NA NA
12 wk 70/95 (42/58) NA 68/91 (42/58) NA 0.71 (0.31 to 1.62)d .42
24 wk 55/105 (34/66) NA 62/107 (37/63) NA 0.58 (0.25 to 1.34)d .20
JTC version 85:15 (No. of beads)
Baseline 3.8 (4.4) NA 3.9 (4.0) NA NA NA
12 wk 4.3 (4.3) NA 4.1 (3.9) NA 0.39 (0.43) [−0.45 to 1.22] .37
24 wk 5.2 (4.8) NA 4.1 (3.3) NA 0.99 (0.42) [0.16 to 1.83] .02
JTC version 60:40 (yes or no)
Baseline 72/108 (40/60) NA 59/120 (33/67) NA NA NA
12 wk 47/118 (29/71) NA 42/117 (26/74) NA 0.82 (0.26 to 2.51)d .72
24 wk 43/117 (27/73) NA 44/125 (26/74) NA 0.69 (0.22 to 2.18)d .53
JTC version 60:40 (No. of beads)
Baseline 5.7 (5.4) NA 5.7 (5.1) NA NA NA
12 wk 7.0 (5.7) NA 6.8 (5.4) NA 0.28 (0.49) [−0.68 to 1.25] .56
24 wk 7.0 (5.2) 6.5 (4.9) 0.49 (0.49) [−0.47 to 1.45] .32
FaST fast scale score
Baseline 16.9 (4.7) 174 16.7 (4.3) 169 NA NA
12 wk 15.3 (4.9) 165 16.2 (5.0) 160 −1.07 (0.47) [−1.98 to −0.16] .02
24 wk 15.0 (4.4) 160 16.2 (5.1) 168 −1.33 (0.46) [−2.23 to −0.42] .004
FaST slow scale scorec
Baseline 19.9 (4.7) 174 19.7 (4.8) 169 NA NA
12 wk 20.3 (4.8) 165 19.3 (4.8) 160 0.66 (0.45) [−0.22 to 1.55] .14
24 wk 20.3 (4.4) 160 19.3 (4.8) 168 1.00 (0.45) [0.12 to 1.88] .03

Abbreviations: BCSS, Brief Core Schema Scale; FaST, Fast and Slow Thinking Questionnaire; JTC, jumping to conclusions; MANSA, Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life; NA, not applicable; PSWQ, Penn State Worry Questionnaire; TAU, treatment as usual; WEMWBS, Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale.

a

Unless otherwise indicated, low score indicates better outcomes.

b

Unless otherwise indicated, negative effects indicate benefit of SlowMo compared with TAU.

c

High score indicates better outcomes; positive effects indicate benefit of SlowMo compared with TAU.

d

Odds ratio (95% CI).