Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 7;22:248. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07547-9

Table 2.

Numbers of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between D. gallinae stages

Comparisona Number of DEGs, simulation probability > 0.95b Number of DEGs, simulation probability > 0.99b
E vs. L 5619 (↑2697 ↓2922) 2517 (↑814 ↓1703)
E vs. P 5123 (↑2626 ↓2497) 2270 (↑877 ↓1393)
E vs. D 4791 (↑2204 ↓2587) 1824 (↑605 ↓1219)
E vs. AM 4888 (↑2229 ↓2659) 1882 (↑629 ↓1253)
E vs. AF 4654 (↑1886 ↓2768) 1929 (↑628 ↓1301)
L vs. P 3743 (↑1961 ↓1782) 1352 (↑776 ↓576)
L vs. D 5118 (↑2529 ↓2589) 2306 (↑1190 ↓1116)
L vs. AM 5177 (↑2544 ↓2633) 1951 (↑863 ↓1088)
L vs. AF 5729 (↑2692 ↓3037) 2422 (↑1157 ↓1265)
P vs. D 3063 (↑1545 ↓1518) 720 (↑258 ↓462)
P vs. AM 4398 (↑2087 ↓2311) 1117 (↑361 ↓756)
P vs. AF 5086 (↑2373 ↓2713) 1554 (↑590 ↓964)
AM vs. D 3457 (↑2849 ↓1608) 873 (↑606 ↓267)
AF vs. D 4338 (↑2248 ↓2090) 1326 (↑818 ↓508)
AF vs. AM 4624 (↑2261 ↓2363) 1625 (↑771 ↓854)

aAF adult females, AM adult males, D deutonymphs, P protonymphs, L larvae, E eggs. Direction of fold change is relative to the second stage, or condition for each comparison; for example, E vs L, where L is the Reference and E is the Comparison

bThe numbers of DEG is given in black. In brackets, the red arrows indicate the number of DEG upregulated and the blue arrow those that are downregulated). DEGs were determined using a probability cut-off value of 0.95 and 0.99