Table 2.
Comparisons | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Normal vs. abnormal brain tissue | 95 | 100 | 100 | 98 |
Glial vs. nonglial tumors | 83 | 90 | 91 | 80 |
Grade and type of the tumor: all pathologists | 63 | 46 | 76 | 32 |
NP trained* | 88 | 100 | 100 | 86 |
*P‐value | 0.0264 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0016 |
Multimodal confocal imaging is compared with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) diagnosis as a standard of care.
NP is significantly better in grading and subclassifying tumors.