Table 2.
Mean rank/Kruskal–Wallis | Frontal summary score/6 | Overall group rank | Basal ganglia summary score/4 | Overall group rank | Total score/10 | Overall group rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Young control | 9.50 | 7 | 13.32 | 7 | 7.31 | 7 |
Old control | 18.50 | 6 | 22.10 | 6 | 17.44 | 6 |
SVD | 23.00 | 2 | 22.63 | 5 | 21.07 | 4 |
CADASIL | 30.88 | 1 | 38.00 | 1 | 33.88 | 1 |
PADMAL | 23.00 | 2 | 32.90 | 2 | 28.00 | 2 |
Swedish hMID | 22.75 | 5 | 24.50 | 3 | 20.75 | 5 |
HERNS | 23.00 | 2 | 23.00 | 4 | 21.50 | 3 |
Total (n cases) | 41 | 50 | 41 | |||
Chi‐square | 19.181 | 19.131 | 23.052 | |||
d.f. | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||
Asymp. sig. | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Numbers computed for the Kruskal–Wallis H test for mean rank scores for vascular pathology. The cases were different, overall ranks for each group were listed in order of severity from highest rank score = 1 to lowest score = 7. Scoring based on modified methods was described by Deramecourt et al [18].