Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 4;4(2):e00213. doi: 10.1002/edm2.213

Table 2.

Results of the mixed‐effects model

Name Slope L95 U95 SE FDR Slope‐LCD Slope‐HCD
PC(P‐36:4)/PC(O‐36:5) 1.34 0.83 1.85 0.24 0.009 0.63 −0.70
SM(d36:1) 1.44 0.85 2.03 0.28 0.010 1.06 −0.37
PC(P‐38:5)/PC(O‐38:6) 1.04 0.53 1.56 0.24 0.029 0.67 −0.37
SM(d36:2) 0.76 0.38 1.13 0.18 0.029 0.65 −0.10
PC(P‐36:2)/PC(O‐36:3) 1.59 0.77 2.42 0.39 0.036 0.89 −0.70
SM(d34:2) 1.39 0.65 2.15 0.36 0.042 0.80 −0.59
PC(31:0) 1.52 0.67 2.36 0.40 0.043 1.06 −0.46
PC(P‐38:4)/PC(O‐38:5) 1.32 0.57 2.07 0.35 0.043 1.04 −0.28
PC(35:4) 1.04 0.45 1.64 0.28 0.043 0.78 −0.26
LPC(O‐16:0) 1.28 0.55 2.01 0.35 0.043 0.32 −0.95
SM(d38:2) 0.89 0.38 1.39 0.24 0.043 0.64 −0.25

Shown in the table are (Name) of individual lipid species, interaction slope (Slope), its lower and upper confidence intervals (L95, U95), standard error, p‐value of the slope (FDR) after correction for multiple testing, and slopes for LCD and HCD models (Slope‐LCD, Slope‐HCD) .