TABLE 9.

DSC indicators of each algorithm (100%).

Noise	Organization	FCM	CoFKM	TW-k-means	CombKM	Coclustering	IMV-FCM
0%	A	93.24%	94.75%	94.28%	93.39%	94.02%	95.27%
	B	86.51%	87.79%	87.61%	86.87%	87.99%	88.51%
	C	80.45%	82.44%	82.83%	82.10%	83.04%	85.06%
	Mean	86.73%	88.33%	88.24%	87.45%	88.35%	89.61%
3%	A	92.28%	93.68%	93.77%	93.91%	94.23%	95.08%
	B	85.30%	86.84%	87.04%	86.89%	86.57%	87.62%
	C	79.47%	82.02%	83.22%	82.16%	83.01%	84.41%
	Mean	85.68%	87.51%	88.01%	87.65%	87.94%	89.04%
5%	A	91.36%	91.03%	91.14%	91.09%	91.74%	93.86%
	B	84.89%	84.47%	84.66%	84.82%	84.96%	86.68%
	C	78.55%	80.10%	80.23%	80.34%	80.08%	83.71%
	Mean	84.93%	85.20%	85.34%	85.41%	85.59%	88.08%
7%	A	89.62%	90.02%	90.91%	90.54%	90.74%	92.95%
	B	84.01%	83.36%	83.82%	83.57%	84.10%	85.45%
	C	77.86%	79.03%	79.65%	79.66%	80.12%	82.79%
	Mean	83.83%	84.14%	84.79%	84.59%	84.99%	87.06%
9%	A	85.76%	88.44%	88.62%	88.79%	89.76%	91.87%
	B	83.79%	81.45%	81.89%	81.63%	82.30%	83.67%
	C	77.23%	77.72%	77.79%	77.87%	78.31%	81.32%
	Mean	82.26%	82.54%	82.77%	82.76%	83.46%	85.62%