Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 15;22(12):2175–2183. doi: 10.1111/jch.14047

Table 2.

Direct comparison results of traditional meta‐analysis

Number of studies SMD I2 p Models
ACEI vs
ARB 4 0.04 (−0.21, 0.28) 0.00% .741 fixed‐effects models
BB 3 0.63 (−1.06,−0.20) 0.00% .953 fixed‐effects models
CCB 13 0.10 (−0.04, 0.25) 17.70% .27 random‐effects models
DIU 6 0.05 (−0.22, 0.33) 69% .006 random‐effects models
ARB vs
CCB 4 −0.82 (−1.22,‐0.42) 0.00% .684 fixed‐effects models
BB 6 −0.21 (−0.32,−0.10) 0.00% .693 fixed‐effects models
DIU 1 NA NA NA NA
CCB vs
BB 2 0.04 (−0.22, 0.29) 0.00% .463 random‐effects models
DIU 7 −0.16 (−0.44, 0.13) 28.8% .230 random‐effects models
BB vs
DIU 2 0.20 (−0.68, 0.28) 61.50% .107 fixed‐effects models

Abbreviations: ACEI, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BB, beta‐blockers; CCB, calcium channel blocker; DIU, diuretic; NA, not available; SMD, standardized mean difference.