Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 13;21(5):627–634. doi: 10.1111/jch.13531

Table 3.

Baseline characteristics and outcome results after pairwise propensity matching (diuretics vs beta blockers and RAS blockers vs CCB)

Baseline characteristics after propensity matching Diuretics Beta blockers RAS blockers CCB
Number of patients 11 766 11 766 8887 8887
Number of patients excluded due to propensity matching 2042 8772 26896 272
In percent (%) 15 43 75 3
Mean age at start of therapy 54.9 54.8 51.6 57.8
SD 14.8 15.9 16.1 15.9
Female (%) 70.4 70.8 58.1 58.2
White (%) 77.5 77.5 62.2 62.3
Black (%) 12.6 12.7 23.0 22.9
Pre−existing conditions
Ischemic heart disease (I20‐I25) (%) 1.9 1.9 2.6 2.5
Diabetes (E08‐E13) (%) 4.5 4.8 4.4 4.4
Atrial fibrillation (I48) (%) 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.2
Three‐y outcomes of the matched cohorts
First stroke (I63) (%) 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.3
Any cerebrovascular outcome (I60‐I69) (%) 2.7 3.6 2.4 4.1
Myocardial infarction (I21) (%) 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.3
Any ischemic heart disease (I20‐I25) (%) 2.8 6.0 2.3 3.9
Chronic kidney disease (N18, I12, I13) (%) 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.9
Any of these CV outcomes (%) 5.4 9.0 5.3 7.6