Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 25;21(11):1647–1653. doi: 10.1111/jch.13705

Table 2.

Covariates effect on MACE in univariate and multivariable approach in total data

  Patients (n = 1799)

Unadjusted

P value

Adjusted p value

(multivariate analysis)

MACE (n = 130) no MACE (n = 1669) HR L U P value
Age at enrollment PCI (y) 57.82 ± 11.22 60.32 ± 11.23 .015 0.981 0.965 0.997 .019
Gender (Male) 81 (62.3) 1020 (61.11) .788 1.077 0.745 1.557 .692
no hDM no hHTN 27 (20.76) 578 (34.63) <.001 1
hDM 11 (8.46) 165 (9.88) 1.542 0.763 3.114 .228
hHTN 47 (36.15) 601 (36.00) 2.031 1.246 3.311 .005
hDM + hHTN 45 (34.61) 325 (19.47) 3.774 2.299 6.195 <.001

Data were presented as mean ± sd for age and number (%) for other variables.

Male is the reference for gender and no hDM no hHTN group is the reference with regard to hDM and hHTN status.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; L, lower bound; U, upper bound.

Bold values imply statistical significance.