TABLE 6.
Roseburia | Ruminococcus | Lachnospira | Alistipes 2 | Faecalibacterium | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | r | P | ρ | P | r | P | r | P | r | P | |
Acetate, μmol/g DM feces | 54 | 0.13 | 0.36 | 0.02 | 0.87 | −0.06 | 0.65 | −0.26 | 0.06 | 0.24 | 0.08 |
Cholic acid, μmol/g dry feces, | 40 | −0.29 | 0.07 | −0.05 | 0.74 | −0.29 | 0.07 | −0.35 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.79 |
Chenodeoxycholic acid, μmol/g dry feces | 36 | −0.10 | 0.56 | −0.11 | 0.54 | −0.23 | 0.18 | −0.20 | 0.23 | 0.13 | 0.45 |
Lithocholic acid, μmol/g dry feces | 45 | 0.05 | 0.72 | −0.11 | 0.48 | 0.12 | 0.43 | 0.06 | 0.70 | −0.06 | 0.69 |
Deoxycholic acid, μmol/1 g dry feces | 43 | −0.19 | 0.23 | −0.16 | 0.31 | −0.12 | 0.46 | −0.20 | 0.20 | −0.07 | 0.64 |
Plasma glucose AUC, mmol/L × 120 min | 46 | −0.09 | 0.55 | −0.05 | 0.76 | −0.09 | 0.56 | −0.16 | 0.30 | −0.08 | 0.60 |
Plasma insulin AUC, pmol/L × 120 min | 45 | 0.08 | 0.60 | −0.27 | 0.08 | −0.32 | 0.03 | −0.13 | 0.38 | −0.02 | 0.88 |
HOMA-IR | 45 | −0.02 | 0.91 | −0.14 | 0.35 | −0.08 | 0.61 | −0.09 | 0.57 | 0.04 | 0.79 |
Matsuda index | 44 | −0.15 | 0.35 | 0.26 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.37 | −0.05 | 0.77 |
Plasma TNF-ɑ pg/mL | 50 | −0.04 | 0.80 | −0.02 | 0.92 | −0.15 | 0.29 | −0.09 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
Plasma CRP, μg/mL | 49 | 0.13 | 0.37 | −0.12 | 0.42 | −0.17 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.32 |
Plasma IL-6, pg/mL | 49 | 0.09 | 0.54 | −0.03 | 0.83 | −0.08 | 0.60 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.42 |
Visceral abdominal adiposity, g | 53 | −0.14 | 0.33 | −0.27 | 0.05 | −0.09 | 0.52 | 0.10 | 0.47 | −0.12 | 0.38 |
Subcutaneous abdominal adiposity, g | 53 | −0.02 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.99 | −0.10 | 0.48 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.84 |
Data were analyzed by Spearman or Pearson bivariate correlations. CRP, C-reactive protein; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-ɑ, tumer necrosis factor ɑ; .
2Data were transformed prior to analysis.