Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 30;19(3):270–279. doi: 10.1111/jch.12897

Table 2.

Factors Associated With the Intention of Following a Low‐Salt Diet

Man Woman
OR 95% CI P Value OR 95% CI P Value
Age group, y
30–49 1 1
50–59 1.78 1.07–2.97 .028 1.58 1.05–2.40 .030
60–69 2.50 1.39–4.49 .002 3.42 2.12–5.51 <.001
Formal education period
12 and <12 years 1 1
13 and >13 years 0.84 0.56–1.28 .422 1.40 0.97–2.01 .075
Employment status
Full‐time employee 1 1
Part‐time employee 0.75 0.36–1.56 .447 0.92 0.56–1.50 .722
Company executive 1.36 0.59–3.14 .478 3.05 0.78–11.85 .108
Self‐employed 0.83 0.44–1.56 .567 1.13 0.52–2.48 .759
Full‐time homemaker 1.40 0.85–2.32 .185
Unemployed 1.23 0.63–2.37 .547 0.84 0.32–2.20 .962
Other 1.84 0.76–4.47 .180 0.68 0.45–1.03 .720
Family structure
Living alone and with one generation 1 1
Living with two or more generation 0.60 0.39–0.91 .018 0.68 0.45–1.03 .072
Low‐salt diet is a protective factor of cancer
Agree 1 1
Disagree 0.76 0.51–1.16 .207 0.51 0.35–0.76 .001

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. Data were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.