Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 7;19(4):361–368. doi: 10.1111/jch.12988

Table 1.

Individual Trial Design

Study/First Author Design Conducting Location Inclusion Criteria Sample Size, No. Mean Age, y Men, No. (%) Follow‐up, mo Intervention Mean Ablation Points
Kaltenbach10 Self‐controlled, single‐center, prospective Frankfurt Mild resistant hypertension, with SBP between 140 and 160 mm Hg 20 61±10.8 11 (59) 6 Conventional RDN Left 5.6; right 5.6
Ott11 Self‐controlled, multicenter, prospective Erlangen, Homburg, Columbus, and New York Mild resistant hypertension, with SBP between 140 and 160 mm Hg 54 63.6±11 38 (70) 6 Conventional RDN At least 4 each
Desch12 Randomized sham‐controlled Lübeck, Leipzig Mild resistant hypertension, with a mean daytime SBP on ABPM between 135 and 149 mm Hg 35/[36 as sham] 64.5±7.6 [57.4±8.6] 27 (77)/[25 (69)] 6 Conventional RDN Left 5.5, right 5.7
Pooled Retrospective pooled analysis Multicenter Mild resistant hypertension 145 62±10 101 (69.7) 6 Conventional RDN ≥4 ablation each side

Abbreviations: ABPM, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; RDN, renal denervation; SBP, systolic blood pressure.