Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249523

Table 2. Significant spatial clusters of TB in Zimbabwe based on maximum reported cluster size from 2015–2018.

Year Cluster # District Radius # of Locations LLR Pvalue Observed Expected RR
1 Seke 0 1 904.05 0.001 1075 210 5.29
2 Sanyati 0 1 771.97 0.001 1024 223 4.74
3 Chiredzi 102 2 687.02 0.001 2295 970 2.50
4 Lupane 82 2 269.10 0.001 968 418 2.37
5 Matobo 76 3 175.84 0.001 1135 621 1.87
2015 6 Gweru 89 4 159.26 0.001 2147 1443 1.53
7 Umguza 45 2 131.78 0.001 2137 1491 1.47
8 Mazowe 58 3 67.12 0.001 1766 1335 1.35
9 Mutare 63 2 40.85 0.001 1165 888 1.33
10 Masvingo 0 1 17.57 0.001 766 615 1.25
11 Mt Darwin 0 1 3.76 0.02 494 436 1.14
12 Marondera 0 1 2 0.01 410 371 1.10
1 Mhondoro-Ngezi 112 8 620.61 0.001 4434 2579 1.86
2 Lupane 82 2 405.73 0.001 1143 435 2.70
3 Beitbridge 117 3 380.88 0.001 1822 899 2.10
2016 4 Mutare 0 1 132.36 0.001 767 403 1.93
5 Bulima 102 5 100.36 0.001 2800 2144 1.34
6 Mt Darwin 0 1 15.37 0.001 580 458 1.27
7 Hurungwe 92 2 13.75 0.001 1207 1037 1.17
8 Chipinge 125 5 6.62 0.001 2496 2326 1.08
2 Kwekwe 120 9 714.10 0.001 4561 2569 1.94
3 Beitbridge 117 3 305.04 0.001 1649 852 2.00
4 Seke 0 1 267.41 0.001 626 212 3.00
2017 5 Hwange 150 3 70.46 0.001 931 618 1.53
6 Hurungwe 92 2 50.08 0.001 1316 992 1.34
7 Mutare 0 1 34.13 0.001 554 383 1.46
8 Mt Darwin 0 1 33.94 0.001 617 436 1.43
9 Insiza 90 5 24.28 0.001 2546 2225 1.16
1 Mhondoro-Ngezi 90 6 1254.75 0.001 4415 1953 2.49
2 Bulilima 231 14 665.80 0.001 6961 4559 1.69
2018 3 Mwenezi 90 2 127.49 0.001 1099 656 1.70
4 Mutare 0 1 111.54 0.001 774 432 1.81
5 Mt Darwin 0 1 24.45 0.001 653 492 1.34
6 Bikita 0 1 18.12 0.001 494 373 1.33

RR: Relative risk, LLR: likelihood ratio.