Table 2. Summarized advantages and disadvantages of each method tested for coral cell culture.
Method used | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Cell dissociation | ||
|
Easy; Adapted to species with large polyps and/or large tentacles; |
Not very effective; Time consuming; yielding ~50%; not adapted to species with small polyps and/or small tentacles; |
|
Relatively easy to perform regardless of the polyp size; | Can be rough for cell membranes and lead to contamination from the mucus layer; time-consuming; |
|
Simple incubation method; | Effect on desmocytes unknown; mix of single cells and incompletely dissociated tissue fragments detach from the skeleton; |
Cell digestion | ||
|
Simple incubation method; high yield; converts proteins to peptides; can promote cell aggregation; | Effect on desmocytes unknown; no standard concentrations or incubation time available; cell clusters; can damage cell surface proteins and their subsequent adhesion capacity; chelating agent necessary to ensure effectiveness (e.g. EDTA); |
|
Simple incubation method; high yield especially for algae cells; | Effect on desmocytes unknown; no standard concentrations or incubation time available; can affect cell adhesion/aggregation capacity, often presented as a blend of various enzymes; |
Cell sorting | ||
|
Only small doses of Percoll needed each time; | Not cost-effective; density gradients are not always marked enough; protocol must be optimized accordingly to the density characteristics of targeted cells and multiple successive Percoll step gradients needed for full separation; |
|
Staining process is simple; a lot of data is generated (cell counts per population and relative cell sizes); | Multiple dyes can be costly; partially based on ROS concentration; multiple passes needed for full separation; still new method applied to coral cells; |
Growth medium | Methods established with other living organisms; many products available to purchase; | Does not correspond exactly to coral cell needs; must be combined with additives for optimization; |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
Antibiotic treatment | ||
|
Method established with other living organisms; many products available to purchase; | Little effect on the bacterial and viral population observed; |
|
Method established with other living organisms; many products available to purchase; More effective than Pen-Strep alone; | |
|
Method established with other living organisms; many products available to purchase; | Most efficient when combined with other antibiotics that target DNA synthesis; |
Cell attachment | ||
|
Simple; | ~40% of cells lost; |
|
Can be tested with macromolecules other than collagen; | Might need to be tailored to different cell types; |
Cell visualization for counting | ||
|
No incubation necessary; | Lethal stain; reacts with salts and creates clusters; |