Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249734

Table 2. Diagnostic performance of Xpert Ultra and smear using culture as the reference standard.

Method Pulmonary samples (n = 1120) Extra-pulmonary samples (n = 461)
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
  (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI)
Smear 53,4 99,1 87,5 94,8 22,5 99,3 75 93,1
(44–62,6) (98,3–99,6) (77,6–94,1) (93,2–96) (10,8–38,5) (97,9–99,9) (42,8–94,5) (90,3–95,3)
Xpert Ultra assay (all samples) 91,5 95,5 70,6 99 90 91,9 51,4 99
(85–95,9) (94–96,7) (62,7–77,7) (98,1–99,5) (76,3–97,2) (88,9–94,3) (39,1–63,6) (97,4–99,7)
Smear positive 100 88,9 98,4 100 100 66,7 90 100
(94,3–100) (51,8–99,7) (91,6–100) (63,1–100) (66,4–100) (9,4–99,2) (55,5–99,8) (15,8–100)
Smear negative 81,8 95,6 50,6 99 87,1 92,1 45 99
  (69,1–90,9) (94,1–96,8) (39,8–61,3) (98,1–99,5) (70,2–96,4) (89,1–94,5) (32,1–58,4) (97,4–99,7)

PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CI, confidence interval.