Table 4.
Change of the Percentage of Renal Transplant Recipients Within Each Category of Clinical Action After the Educational Intervention
| No Clinical Action | Equivocal Action | Appropriate Action | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of educational intervention on clinical inertia in blood pressure control | |||
| Pre‐intervention (n=195) | 21 (10.8%) | 45 (23.1%) | 129 (66.2%) |
| Intervention (n=197) | 5 (2.5%) | 35 (17.8%) | 157 (79.7%) |
| P valuea | <.001 | .21 | .003 |
| Post‐intervention (n=130) | 5 (3.8%) | 16 (12.3%) | 109 (83.3%) |
| P valueb | .024 | .12 | <.001 |
| Effect of educational intervention on clinical inertia on LDL‐C control | |||
| Pre‐intervention (n=195) | 55 (28.2%) | 6 (3.0%) | 134 (68.7%) |
| Intervention (n=197) | 36 (18.3%) | 15 (7.6%) | 146 (74.1%) |
| P valuea | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.14 |
| Post‐intervention (n=131) | 22 (11.1%) | 5 (2.5%) | 104 (79.4%) |
| P valueb | .008 | .62 | .008 |
| Effect of educational intervention on clinical inertia in diabetes control | |||
| Pre‐intervention (n=195) | 20 (10.3%) | 9 (4.6%) | 166 (85.1%) |
| Intervention (n=198) | 13 (6.6%) | 10 (5.1%) | 175 (84.4%) |
| P valuea | .13 | .51 | .21 |
| Post‐intervention (n=133) | 6 (4.5%) | 3 (2.3%) | 124 (93.2%) |
| P valueb | .047 | .26 | .031 |
Abbreviation: LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol. aComparison between pre‐intervention and intervention visit. bComparison between pre‐intervention and post‐intervention visit.