Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 26;91(1):105–110. doi: 10.2319/051120-420.1

Table 4. .

Pearson Correlation Analysis Between Clinical Periodontal Parameters and GCF Biomarkers in Nondiabetic and T2DM Groupsa,b

Variables
TNF-α
IL-6
Ghrelin
Resistin
AGEs
RANKL
Plaque scores
 Nondiabetic group correlation coefficient –0.2754 –0.5490 0.7513 0.7912 –0.8356 –0.8210
 P-value .8923 .1845 .0604 .4113 .5186 .7012
 T2DM group correlation coefficient 0.8911 0.3985 0.4733 0.9371 0.5011 0.4242
 P-value .9936 .0923 .0951 .7253 .4277 .1598
Bleeding on probing
 Nondiabetic group correlation coefficient 0.8219 –0.7511 0.5732 0.8162 –0.4848 0.8819
 P-value .9615 .4395 .0701 .9110 .0644 .5284
 T2DM group correlation coefficient –0.7322 0.3941 0.4353 0.1372 0.0194 0.6936
 P-value .1348 .0856 .6672 .0226 .0186 .3487
Probing depth
 Nondiabetic group correlation coefficient 0.7553 0.7346 0.4986 0.4857 0.9536 0.4534
 P-value .2364 .9786 .9774 .5698 .4564 .5675
 T2DM group correlation coefficient 0.9234 0.9483 0.7563 0.3874 0.9484 0.9487
 P-value .9546 .1345 .3745 .9867 .7573 .8374
a 

AGE indicates advanced glycation end product; GCF, gingival crevicular fluid; IL, interleukin; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

b 

Bold letters indicate statistically significant difference between groups at P < .05.