Table 2. .
Arat et al. (2008)22,23 |
Masi et al. (2009)24 |
Matta et al. (2009)25 |
Leonardi et al. (2012)26 |
Melgaço et al. (2014)27 |
|
1. Was the study question or objective clearly stated? | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
2. Were eligibility/selection criteria for the study population prespecified and clearly described? | YES | NR | NR | YES | YES |
3. Were the participants in the study representative of those who would be eligible for the test/service/intervention in the general or clinical population of interest (mixed or permanent dentition in growing patients)? | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
4. Were all eligible participants that met the prespecified entry criteria enrolled (no symptoms of TMD, no fixed appliances)? | NR | NR | YES | YES | YES |
5. Was the sample size sufficiently large to provide confidence in the findings? | NR | NR | NR | YES | YES |
6. Was the test/service/intervention clearly described and delivered consistently across the study population? | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
7. Were the outcome measures prespecified, clearly defined, valid, reliable, and assessed consistently across all study participants (CBT or resonance + adequate parameters to evaluate the outcome)? | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
8. Were the people assessing the outcomes blinded to the participants' exposures/interventions? | YES | YES | NR | YES | YES |
9. Was the loss to follow-up after baseline 20% or less? Were those lost to follow-up accounted for in the analysis? | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
10. Did the statistical methods examine changes in outcome measures from before to after the intervention? Were statistical tests done that provided P values for the pre-to-post changes? | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES |
11. Were outcome measures of interest taken multiple times before the intervention and multiple times after the intervention (ie, did they use an interrupted time-series design)? | NR | YES | NR | YES | YES |
12. If the intervention was conducted at a group level (eg, a whole hospital, a community, etc.) did the statistical analysis take into account the use of individual-level data to determine effects at the group level? | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
QUALITY ASSESSMENT | FAIR | GOOD | FAIR | GOOD | GOOD |
NA indicates not applicable; NR, not reported.