Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 28;53(4):691–698. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02688-4

Table 1.

Demographic, clinical, and adverse effect data of the high and low neuroticism groups at survey

Variables High neuroticism (N = 107) Low neuroticism (N = 417) p value Total sample (N = 524)
Age at survey, mean (SD) 64.8 (5.9) 66.1 (5.9) 0.06 65.8 (5.9)
Years RALP-survey, mean (SD) 3.2 (1.2) 3.3 (1.3) 0.19 3.3 (1.3)
D’Amico risk groups, N (%) 0.07
 Low 37 (35) 99 (24) 136 (26)
 Intermediate 42 (39) 201 (48) 243 (46)
 High 28 (26) 117 (28) 145 (28)
 Positive margins, N (%) 16 (15) 70 (17) 0.65 86 (16)
Nerve sparing, N (%) 0.34
 None 30 (28) 91 (22) 121 (23)
 Unilateral 49 (46) 196 (47) 245 (47)
 Bilateral 28 (26) 130 (31) 158 (30)
Paired relationship, N (%) 99 (93) 381 (91) 0.70 480 (92)
Short education, N (%) 58 (54) 150 (36)  < 0.001 209 (39)
Currently working, N (%) 54 (51) 195 (47) 0.47 249 (49)
Comorbidity, N (%) 0.001
 None 33 (31) 190 (46) 223 (43)
 1 disease 39 (36) 154 (37) 193 (37)
  ≥ 2 diseases 35 (33) 73 (17) 108 (20)
EPIC-26 scores, mean (SD)
 Urinary domain* 69.9 (24.7) 80.2 (20.6)  < 0.001 78.1 (21.8)
 Incontinence subscale 67.8 (27.5) 74.7 (25.6) 0.014 73.3 (26.1)
 Irritation/obstruction subscale* 74.0 (29.7) 85.4 (23.4)  < 0.001 83.1 (25.0)
Bowel domain* 83.3 (22.2) 93.5 (14.0)  < 0.001 91.5 (16.5)
Sexual domain* 27.5 (26.2) 36.3 (28.9) 0.003 34.5 (28.6)
Hormonal domain* 66.0 (23.7) 91.7 (15.5  < 0.001 86.5 (20.3)
EPIC-26 categories, N (%)
 Daily use of pads 42 (40) 142 (35) 0.32 184 (36)
 Inability to perform intercourse 89 (83) 302 (72) 0.023 391 (75)

*Between-groups mean score differences > 10% of total mean score [19]