Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 9;23(4):725–732. doi: 10.1007/s10903-020-01102-6

Table 3.

Recruitment strategies and yield across the eight Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium sites

All sites Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6c Site 7 Site 8e
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Clinic visit 1650 (68.1) 239 (79.7) 201 (66.8) 209 (69.9) 148 (49.3) 305 (100.0) 109 (36.1) 170 (55.0)d 269 (87.9)
Affiliated sites 377 (15.6) 61 (20.3) 1 (0.3) 31 (10.4) 55 (18.3) 0 166 (55.0) 61 (19.7) 2 (0.7)
Targeted phone calls 144 (5.9) 0 0 47 (15.7) 35 (11.7) 0 2 (0.7) 56 (18.1) 4 (1.3)
Hospital in-patient 141 (5.8) 0 68 (22.6) 12 (4.0) 32 (10.7) 0 10 (3.3) 0 19 (6.2)
Community event 52 (2.1) 0 5 (1.7) 0 8 (2.7) 0 8 (2.6) 19 (6.1) 12 (3.9)
Pain/infusion center 25 (1.0) 0 22 (7.3) 0 1 (0.3) 0 0 2 (0.6) 0
Emergency department 14 (0.6) 0 1 (0.3) 0 13 (4.3) 0 0 0 0
Othera 19 (0.8) 0 3 (1.0) 0 8 (2.7) 0 7 (2.3) 1 (0.3) 0
Total (non-missing responses) 2,422 300 301 299 300 305 302 309 306
Missingb 10 0 3 6 0 1 0 0 0

aOther refers to recruitment at other medical visits and in-person interviews

bMissing refers to survey items with no response

cSite 6 approached 386 individuals overall, 302 individuals were enrolled

dSite 7 approached 173 individuals in the clinic, 3 declined due to various reasons: (1) not interested in the study, (2) time constraints, (3) a minor and their parents declined participation)

eSite 8 approached 312 people overall, 5 declined participation, one was not eligible, 306 individuals consented and were enrolled