1 |
81 |
2007 |
Kurtz |
Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 |
2 |
51 |
2010 |
Bozic |
The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States |
3 |
33 |
2010 |
Hossain |
Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty |
4 |
33 |
2007 |
Engh |
Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss |
5 |
32 |
2008 |
Meneghini |
Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement |
6 |
31 |
2012 |
Lachiewicz |
Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty? |
7 |
31 |
2005 |
Kurtz |
Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002 |
8 |
30 |
2006 |
Radnay |
Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems |
9 |
29 |
2011 |
Howard |
Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty |
10 |
29 |
2001 |
Clatworthy |
The use of structural allograft for uncontained defects in revision total knee arthroplasty A minimum five-year review |
11 |
27 |
2011 |
Mortazavi |
Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause |
12 |
26 |
2006 |
Backstein |
Management of bone loss: structural grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty |
13 |
25 |
2009 |
Wood |
Results of press-fit stems in revision knee arthroplasties |
14 |
25 |
2009 |
Long |
Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up |
15 |
25 |
2009 |
Bauman |
Limitations of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty |
16 |
24 |
2008 |
Suarez |
Why do revision knee arthroplasties fail? |
17 |
24 |
1995 |
Haas |
Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement |
18 |
22 |
2013 |
Alexander |
Cementless metaphyseal sleeves used for large tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty |
19 |
21 |
2003 |
Whaley |
Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty |
20 |
20 |
2015 |
Kamath |
Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up |
21 |
20 |
2006 |
Lotke |
Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty |
22 |
19 |
2010 |
Pearse |
Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry |
23 |
19 |
2003 |
Fehring |
Stem fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis |
24 |
18 |
2013 |
Schmitz |
Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty |
25 |
18 |
2011 |
Beckmann |
Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature |
26 |
18 |
2007 |
Saldanha |
Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty - results of a multicentre study |
27 |
17 |
2013 |
Villanueva-Martinez |
Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients |
28 |
17 |
2013 |
Rao |
Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement |
29 |
17 |
2013 |
Agarwal |
Metal metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee replacement |
30 |
17 |
2009 |
Kim |
Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis |
31 |
17 |
2009 |
Jamsen |
Risk factors for infection after knee arthroplasty A register-based analysis of 43,149 cases |
32 |
16 |
2014 |
Barnett |
Use of stepped porous titanium metaphyseal sleeves for tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term results |
33 |
16 |
2009 |
Kurtz |
Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030 |
34 |
16 |
2007 |
Mabry |
The role of stems and augments for bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty |
35 |
15 |
2015 |
Graichen |
Direct, Cementless, Metaphyseal Fixation in Knee Revision Arthroplasty With Sleeves-Short-Term Results |
36 |
15 |
2014 |
Derome |
Treatment of large bone defects with trabecular metal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term clinical and radiographic outcomes |
37 |
15 |
2010 |
Mortazavi |
Revision total knee arthroplasty infection: incidence and predictors |
38 |
15 |
2007 |
Pour |
Rotating hinged total knee replacement: use with caution |
39 |
15 |
2006 |
Sheng |
Revision total knee arthroplasty: 1990 through 2002 A review of the Finnish arthroplasty registry |
40 |
15 |
2005 |
Hockman |
Augments and allografts in revision total knee arthroplasty: usage and outcome using one modular revision prosthesis |
41 |
15 |
2002 |
Sharkey |
Insall Award paper Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? |
42 |
15 |
1999 |
Engh |
Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction |
43 |
15 |
1997 |
Peters |
Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study |
44 |
14 |
2011 |
Haidukewych |
Metaphyseal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: indications and techniques |
45 |
14 |
2010 |
Park |
Comparison of static and mobile antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty |
46 |
14 |
2009 |
Meneghini |
Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement Surgical technique |
47 |
14 |
2007 |
Mabry |
Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular cemented stems: long-term follow-up |
48 |
14 |
2007 |
Johnson |
The survivorship and results of total knee replacements converted from unicompartmental knee replacements |
49 |
14 |
1997 |
Engh |
Treatment of major defects of bone with bulk allografts and stemmed components during total knee arthroplasty |
50 |
13 |
2013 |
Schroer |
Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011 |