Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 23;4(2):543–552. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.1c00018

Table 2. Means and Standard Deviations of Acute Subjective Experiences and Persisting Effects among the Total Sample and among Those with Depression, Anxiety, PTSD, Alcohol Misuse/AUD, or Drug Misuse/DUD as a Function of Whether Conditions Improved or Did Not Improve Following Mescaline Usea.

    depression (n = 184)
anxiety (n = 210)
PTSD (n = 72)
variables total sample (N = 452) better (n = 159) no change or worse (n = 25) t-stat d better (n = 167) no change or worse (n = 43) t-stat d better (n = 55) no change or worse (n = 17) t-stat d
psychological insight (PIQ) 2.4(1.2) 2.9(1.0) 1.5(0.9) –6.6*** 1.5 3.0(0.9) 1.7(1.0) –8.5*** 1.4 3.2(1.0) 2.3(1.1) –3.1*** 0.9
mystical-type effects (MEQ) 3.2(1.1) 3.5(1.0) 2.2(1.0) –6.0*** 1.3 3.5(0.9) 2.4(1.2) –6.9*** 1.0 3.7(0.8) 2.7(1.4) –3.7*** 0.9
challenging effects (CEQ) 0.6(0.7) 0.7(0.6) 0.8(0.9) 0.9 NS 0.7(0.6) 0.9(0.9) 1.8 NS 0.7(0.6) 1.1(1.1) 2.1* 0.5
ego dissolution (EDI) 2.4(1.3) 2.6(1.2) 1.6(1.0) –3.8*** 1.0 2.7(1.2) 1.7(1.0) –4.8*** 0.9 2.6(1.3) 2.1(1.3) –1.5 NS
personal meaning 4.6(1.4) 4.9(1.3) 3.6(1.3) –4.5*** 1.0 4.8(1.4) 4.1(1.2) –3.0** 0.5 5.1(1.2) 4.2(1.4) –2.4* 0.7
spiritual significance 4.4(1.9) 4.9(1.6) 3.3(1.8) –4.5*** 0.9 4.8(1.6) 3.6(2.0) –4.2*** 0.7 4.8(1.4) 4.5(2.0) –0.7 NS
psychologically challenging 2.8(2.1) 4.9(1.6) 2.3(1.8) –1.5 NS 2.8(2.0) 2.5(2.1) –0.8 NS 2.7(2.1) 2.9(2.0) 0.5 NS
psychologically insightful 4.1(1.7) 4.7(1.6) 2.9(1.5) –5.4*** 1.2 4.5(1.6) 3.5(1.7) –3.5** 0.6 4.9(1.6) 3.4(2.0) –3.1** 0.8
well-being/life satisfaction 2.1(1.1) 2.5(0.7) 0.7(0.9) –10.6*** 2.2 2.5(0.7) 1.1(1.1) –9.1*** 1.5 2.5(0.8) 1.5(1.4) –3.6** 0.9
life’s purpose 1.8(1.1) 2.1(1.0) 0.7(0.8) –6.8*** 1.6 2.2(1.0) 1.0(1.0) –6.8*** 1.2 2.2(1.0) 1.3(1.2) –3.1** 0.8
life’s meaning 1.8(1.2) 2.0(1.1) 0.6(0.7) –6.0*** 1.5 2.1(1.0) 1.0(1.0) –6.4*** 1.1 2.3(1.0) 1.2(1.1) –3.9*** 1.1
social relationships 1.6(1.3) 2.0(1.0) 0.6(0.8) –6.5*** 1.6 2.1(1.0) 0.7(1.2) –7.6*** 1.3 2.2(0.9) 1.5(1.2) –2.7** 0.7
attitudes about life 1.9(1.1) 2.3(0.8) 0.8(0.8) –8.4*** 1.9 2.3(0.8) 1.1(1.2) –7.8*** 1.2 2.4(1.0) 1.5(1.1) –3.4** 0.9
attitudes about self 1.8(1.1) 2.0(1.0) 0.8(0.8) –6.4*** 1.3 2.2(1.0) 1.1(0.9) –7.2*** 1.2 2.3(1.1) 1.5(1.2) –2.6* 0.7
relationship to nature 2.0(1.0) 2.3(0.9) 1.1(0.9) –6.1*** 1.3 2.4(0.9) 1.3(1.1) –6.5*** 1.1 2.4(1.0) 1.6(1.1) –2.9** 0.8
behaviors 1.5(1.1) 1.9(1.0) 0.5(0.8) –6.9*** 1.6 2.0(1.0) 0.7(1.1) –7.8*** 1.2 2.2(1.0) 1.1(1.2) –3.5** 1.0
how spiritual you are 1.6(1.2) 1.9(1.1) 0.6(0.8) –5.8*** 1.4 1.9(1.0) 0.9(1.1) –5.7*** 1.0 2.0(1.2) 1.1(1.2) 2.8** 0.8
attitudes about death 1.2(1.2) 1.5(1.3) 0.5(0.8) –3.6*** 0.9 1.5(1.2) 0.5(0.8) –5.2*** 1.0 1.7(1.3) 0.8(1.2) –2.6* 0.7
views re: true nature of reality 1.7(1.2) 1.9(1.1) 0.8(0.8) –4.7*** 1.1 2.0(1.1) 1.1(1.2) –4.4*** 0.8 2.2(1.2) 0.9(1.1) –3.8*** 1.1
a

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Note: Cohen’s d was calculated to estimate effect sizes and is interpreted as 0.2 = small, 0.5 = medium. 0.8 = large. Scores on the PIQ, MEQ, and CEQ range from 0 to 5, and ratings of subjective well-being can range from −3 to +3.