Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar;19(3):402–432. doi: 10.2174/1570159X18666200420085712

Table 4.

Reported benefits of cannabinoid use from observational studies.

Author, Year Study Type Legalization (Location) Number of Participants (SCI/Total) Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria Male/Female/ Transgender Mean Age Reported Pain Relief Reported Spasticity Relief Other Benefits
Dunn & Davis, 1974 [63] Cross-sectional Illegal
(Florida, USA)
10/10 SCI patients using cannabis - 10/0/0 NR Relief: 50% (headache), 40%
(phantom);
Pain
distraction (phantom): 20%
Relief: 50% Pleasant sensations: 50%
Malec et al., 1982 [64] Cross-sectional Illegal
(Wisconsin, USA)
43/43 SCI patients - 38/5/0 NR NR Relief: 88% (Complete relief 38%, reduction to mild 46%, severe to moderate 4%) NR
Warms et al., 2002 [68] Cross-sectional MC legal starting Nov 1998, study V1 Feb 1997 – Jul 1998, V2 Aug 1998 – June 2000 (Washington, USA) 471/471 18+ age, 6+ mo since SCI - 334/137/0 42.5 ± 13.2
(18-84)
Pain helpfulness: 4.25 ± 0.76
(max 5);
Most effective pain treatment
NR Pain relief greater than opioids, mexiletine, baclofen, acetaminophen, TCAs, NSAIDs, gabapentin, carbamazepine, etc
Grotenhermen & Schnellea, 2003 [51] Cross-sectional Dronabinol prescription and ∆9-THC special permit (Germany) and permit (Switzerland) 4/165 Members of Association for Cannabis as Medicine No severe disease 101/64/0 Median age: 40.3 ± 12.4 (16-87) NR NR Large disease improvement: 75%, small improvement: 13%, no improvement: 2%, unknown: 7%,
no answer: 3%;
Large improvement
over other drugs:
69%, small improvement: 7%, no improvement:
3%, unknown:
18%, no answer: 4%
Gortera, 2005 [52] Cross-sectional MC legal (Netherlands) ?/107 Members of Multiple Sclerosis society - 48/59/0 Median age: 58.0 NR NR Efficacy: excellent 18%, good 47%, somewhat 18%, none 18%; Statistical
significance in
greater efficacy with inhalation vs. oral
Cardenas & Jensen, 2006 [53] Cross-sectional MC legal (Washington, USA) 117/117 18+ age, tSCI, chronic pain Incomplete questionnaires 85/32/0 48.8 ± 11.7 (21-79) Relief: 6.62 ± 2.54 (max 10)
Benefit duration: 9%: min, 80%: hr, 3%: days, 3%: mo, 6%: y.
Most effective pain treatment
NR Pain relief greater than opioids, mexiletine, baclofen, acetaminophen, TCAs, NSAIDs, gabapentin, carbamazepine, etc
Mahoney et al., 2007 [69] Interview Illegal
(Texas, USA)
24/24 1+ y since SCI, spasticity, English language - 17/7/0 45.1 (21-68) NR Prevents, modulates and stops spasms NR
Author, Year Study Type Legalization (Location) Number of Participants (SCI/Total) Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria Male/
Female/
Transgender
Mean Age Reported Pain Relief Reported Spasticity Relief Other Benefits
Aggarwal et al.a, 2009 [46] Retrospective chart review MC legal (Washington, USA) 5/139 18+ age, pain clinic patients, access to MC with valid doctor documentation Cannabinoid receptor 1 blocker drug rimonabant 88/51/0 Median age: 48 (18-84) Chronic pain relief; often described as the most effective pain
treatment
NR Preferred for less side effects; adjunctive use with opioids reduced opioid dosages and 6% used to reduce opioid dependence
Heutink
et al., 2011 [70]
Cross-sectional MC legal starting 2003, study 1990-2005 (the Netherlands) 279/279 18+ age, SCI rehab patients, living in community - 173/106/0 51.3 ± 14.0 (25-81) (Alcohol and cannabis pooled) Largely effective 83%,
somewhat effective 17%, not effective 0%
NR NR
Shroff, 2015 [54] Interview MC legal (Canada) 53/53 19-65 age, 1+ years since SCI, BC resident, member of paraplegic association - 42/11/0 NR NR NR Preferred for less side effects
Andresen et al., 2017 [44] Cross-sectional MC legal starting 2011, study 1990-2012 (Denmark) 537/537 Inclusion: 18+ age, acquired tSCI, rehab clinic patients Incomplete questionnaires 413/124/0 54.6 ± 14.6 (18-88) Relief: good 35%, very good 24% Relief: good 32%, very good 27% NR
Bruce
et ala., 2018 [50]
Interview MC legal (Illinois, USA) 6/30 18+ age, smoked MC in past 3 mo, qualifying health condition for MC - 19/11/0 44.6 ± 15.9 NR NR Preferred over other pain treatments for quick action, long effects, symptom relief, less side effects; adjunctive use with opioids reduced opioid dose and dependence
Bourke
et al., 2019 [72]
Interview Illegal (New Zealand) 8/8 18+ age, SCI patients using cannabis for pain, residing in New Zealand, English
speaking,
Comorbid conditions inhibiting communication and participation in the interview 6/2/0 Age 20-39: n = 1, 40-59: n= 5, 60+: n=2 Pain relief improving function, community participation and decreased disability NR Preferred for relatively lower fatigue and drowsiness as of prescribed medications
Sleep improvement
Quality of life improvement
Stillman
et al., 2019 [75]
Cross-sectional 39 states in USA, not disclosed; mixed legality 353/353 SCI patients included in mailing lists maintained by Thomas Jefferson University, University of Washington at Seattle, and University of Alabama at Birmingham - 183/107/3 52.74 (19-82) NR NR Muscle relaxation: 90%
Sleep promotion: 84%
Well-being: 75%
Anxiety relief: 70%
Appetite promotion: 53%
All prevalence of positive effects from cannabis were rated higher than prescription medications
Cannabis use: lower prevalence of dehydration, memory loss, lethargy, drowsiness, constipation

Abbreviations: BC: British Columbia; d: days; hr: hours; MC: medical cannabis; min: minutes; mo: months; NR: not reported; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; SCI: spinal cord injury; TCAs: tricyclic antidepressants; ∆9-THC: delta-9-tetracannabidiol; tSCI: traumatic spinal cord injury; y: years. adata listed not limited to people with SCI.