Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 15;16(11):1921–1927. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8738

Table 2.

Differences in MSLT outcomes.

Variable Not Using a REMS-AD at Assessment (n = 324) REMS-AD Continued at MSLT (n = 53) REMS-AD Tapered Prior to MSLT (n = 121)
Mean sleep latency, minutes 10.21 ± 0.28 9.20 ± 0.70 8.78 ± 0.46*
Mean number of SOREMs 0.36 ± 0.06 0.13 ± 0.15 0.65 ± 0.10#
Patients with ≥2 SOREMs, n (%) 31 (9.57) 1 (1.89) 23 (19.1)#
Patients meeting criteria for narcolepsy, n (%) 19 (5.86) 1 (1.89) 16 (13.22)#

MSLT = multiple sleep latency testing; REMS-AD = rapid eye movement suppressing antidepressant; SOREM = sleep-onset rapid eye movement episode. *P value < .009 compared with mean sleep latency for patients not on a REMS-AD at assessment. #P value < .05 compared with mean number of SOREMS, % with ≥2 SOREMs, and % meeting criteria for narcolepsy (mean sleep latency ≤8 minutes and ≥2 SOREMs) on MSLT for patients not on a REMS-AD at assessment and those who continued on REMS-AD at the time of MSLT.