Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 15;16(11):1847–1855. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8686

Table 3.

Results of the quality analysis of the included studies.

Quality Criteria Alonso-Fernández10 Goel27 Lin28 Mortari29 Ozsarac25 Pendharker30 Quadri31 Taguchi26
Sample randomization Yes No No No No No No No
Comparison between treatments Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Blinding of participants Yes No No No No No No No
Description of measurement Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Statistical analysis Yes Unclear Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Defined inclusion/exclusion criteria Yes No Yes Yes Unclear–exclusion only Yes Yes No
Report of follow-up Yes Yes Unclear Yes Yes Yes Yes Unclear
Risk of bias* Low High High Unclear High Unclear Unclear High

*Risk of bias assessment: Yes (high) = 0–4, unclear = 5–6, No (low) = 7.