Table 3.
Results of the quality analysis of the included studies.
| Quality Criteria | Alonso-Fernández10 | Goel27 | Lin28 | Mortari29 | Ozsarac25 | Pendharker30 | Quadri31 | Taguchi26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample randomization | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Comparison between treatments | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Blinding of participants | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Description of measurement | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Statistical analysis | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Defined inclusion/exclusion criteria | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Unclear–exclusion only | Yes | Yes | No |
| Report of follow-up | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear |
| Risk of bias* | Low | High | High | Unclear | High | Unclear | Unclear | High |
*Risk of bias assessment: Yes (high) = 0–4, unclear = 5–6, No (low) = 7.