Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychophysiol. 2019 May 7;34(2):99–109. doi: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000240

Table 2.

Channels with different activity between the ToM and the GI conditions in both groups.

Channel Hemisphere, Brodmann (Percent overlap) MNI
Mean difference Standard error p
X Y Z
Ch 7 R, BA 6, (0.72) −16 65 27 0.037 0.014 .010
Ch 8 R, BA 43, (0.45) 70 −13 20 0.048 0.023 .042
Ch 16 R, BA 8, (1.00) 41 25 54 0.026 0.01 .011
Ch 18 R, BA 6, (0.64) 66 −14 40 0.076 0.017 .000
Ch 21 R, BA 37, (0.90) 58 −58 −30 0.037 0.018 .046
Ch 24 L, BA 8, (0.90) −11 40 57 −0.036 0.017 .034
Ch 26 R, BA 6, (0.83) 28 20 64 −0.023 0.011 .044
Ch 29 R, BA 40, (0.33) 68 −26 42 0.042 0.016 .010
Ch 30 R, BA 22, (0.66) 69 −46 19 0.082 0.023 .001
Ch 31 R, BA 37, (0.75) 65 −59 −7 0.037 0.018 .046
Ch 32 L, BA 46, (0.84) −53 33 24 0.073 0.023 .003
Ch 42 R, BA 19, (0.71) 56 −74 −5 0.069 0.018 .000
Ch 44 L, BA 8, (0.73) −38 21 58 −0.039 0.013 .003
Ch 49 R, BA 3, (0.36) 45 −25 68 0.061 0.027 .029

Note. Ch = Channel, MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute, Bonferroni correction was applied for all comparisons. This table lists the channels that are differentially activated in the two task conditions in the whole study sample.