Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Test Anal. 2020 Jun 11;12(8):1212–1221. doi: 10.1002/dta.2822

TABLE 2.

In vitro binding affinity and efficacy data at hMOR for fentalogs with modifications at Region A or Regions A and B (2–22), Region B (23–29), and Region C (30–34)

Compound # Binding affinity
Efficacy
Ki nM (SEM) % stimulation (SEM) EC50 nM (SEM)
Fentanyl (1) 1.6 (0.4) 89 (9) 32 (8)
2 2.4 (0.4) 75 (6) 55 (10)
3 7.2 (1.7) 61 (4) >1000
4 5(1) 41 (5) 160 (30)
5 6.6 (0.7) 56 (5) 600 (190)
6 1.3 (0.07) 20.4 (2.9) 9.3 (1.9)
7 31 (6) 36 (2) 390 (96)
8 64 (15) 49 (6) >2000
9 43 (10) 43 (2) >1000
10 19 (3) 53 (7) >500
11 2.1 (0.04) 77.9 (1.4) 68 (16)
12 1.1 (0.5) 81 (6) 14(1)
13 4.3 (0.9) 82 (12) 84 (11)
14 6.6 (1.3) 96 (11) 137 (13)
15 1.3 (0.02) 102 (7) 42 (13)
16 4.5 (0.4) 95 (12) >500
17 24 (4) 82 (16) >1000
18 82 (17) >65 >2000
19 4.5 (0.7) 64 (8) 531 (136)
20 3.5 (0.3) 45 (10) 80 (22)
21 0.7 (0.06) 50 (6) 60 (15)
22 17 (5) 54(5) >500
23 0.4 (0.1) 87 (5) 15 (4)
24 10.0 (0.3) 50(1) 164 (24)
25 4.2 (0.3) 48 (10) 79 (22)
26 3.4 (0.3) 69 (2) 58 (10)
27 5.5 (0.8) 52 (7) 450 (75)
28 4.2 (0.7) 31 (3) >1000
29 45 (9) 40 (3) >1000
30 0.32 (0.06) 100 (8) 4.2 (0.6)
31 1.1 (0.2) 93 (4) 25 (6)
32 8(1) 76 (5) 350 (7)
33 6.2 (0.7) 83 (5) 138 (21)
34 14(1) 86 (3) >500

Note. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM of at least three separate assays performed in duplicate.