Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2020 Jul 27;35(6):850–865. doi: 10.1037/pag0000562

Table 4.

Boundary separation for the letter and the brightness discrimination task, averaged over participants of each group.

Groups Boundary Separation ANOVA Contrast Tests
M SE 99% CI Effect F ratio df Partial ƞ2 GC Test statistic
Letter Discrimination Task
College Students 0.15 0.01 [0.13,0.17] G 53.8** 2 0.50 1 t(57.1) = −9.0**
61–74 year olds 0.23 0.01 [0.20,0.25] T 8.762** 1 0.07 2 t(30.6) = −10.1**
75–89 year olds 0.26 0.01 [0.20,0.24] G × T 0.35 2 0.01 3 t(49.7) = −1.5
Brightness Discrimination Task
College Students 0.14 0.01 [0.12,0.15] 1 t(63.4) = −6.6**
61–74 year olds 0.22 0.01 [0.20,0.24] 2 t(26.5) = −5.8**
75–89 year olds 0.24 0.01 [0.22,0.26] 3 t(35.5) = −1.4

Note. G = group; T = task type; CI = confidence interval; GC = group comparison (1 = college students vs. 61–74 year olds; 2 = college students vs. 75–89 year olds; 3 = 61–74 year olds vs. 75–89 year olds).

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01.