Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2020 Sep-Oct;41(5):1383–1396. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000861

TABLE 6.

Results of Pearson r and partial correlation analyses performed separately for data obtained in the two stance conditions

Normal Stance: Pearson r SpeechRec Effort CoPQ CoPlisten Cost
SpeechRec −0.25 −0.51* −0.61* −0.19
Effort 0.21 0.38 0.38
CoPQ 0.81* −0.17
CoPlisten 0.35
Cost

Normal Stance: Partial Correlation Controlling for beHFPTA Age SpeechRec CoPQ CoPlisten Cost
Age 0.10 0.15 −0.17 −0.47
SpeechRec −0.39 −0.49* −0.08
CoPQ 0.77* −0.31
CoPlisten 0.27
Cost

Normal Stance: Partial Correlation Controlling for Age beHFPTA SpeechRec CoPQ CoPlisten Cost
beHFPTA −0.38 0.15 0.43 0.51*
SpeechRec −0.43 −0.58* 0.25
CoPQ 0.79* −0.15
CoPlisten 0.39
Cost

Tandem Stance: Pearson r SpeechRec Effort CoPQ CoPlisten Cost
SpeechRec −0.34 0.02 −0.42 −0.41
Effort −0.19 0.14 0.23
CoPQ 0.46 −0.64*
CoPlisten 0.11
Cost

Tandem Stance: Partial Correlation Controlling for beHFPTA Age SpeechRec CoPQ CoPlisten Cost
Age −0.16 0.10 −0.02 −0.17
SpeechRec 0.08 −0.34 −0.38
CoPQ 0.46 −0.67*
CoPlisten 0.05
Cost

Tandem Stance: Partial Correlation Controlling for Age beHFPTA SpeechRec CoPQ CoPlisten Cost
beHFPTA −0.04 −0.01 0.32 0.23
SpeechRec 0.10 −0.34 −0.42
CoPQ 0.44 −0.65*
CoPlisten 0.11
Cost

Data for speech recognition (SpeechRec), effort ratings (Effort), postural control in dual-task conditions (CoPlisten), and dual-task costs (Cost) were averaged across masker type, spatial condition, and SNR.

*

Significant at the 0.01 level.

Significant at the 0.05 level.

beHFPTA, better-ear high-frequency pure-tone average; CoPQ, postural control in the baseline condition.