Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr;153:86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2020.12.006

Table 1.

TT, jSR, and dyad geometry (per 100 nm of TT length) in rabbit and mouse ventricular myocytes.

TT volume (× 106 nm3) jSR volume (× 106 nm3) Dyad surface
(× 103 nm2)
Dyad volume
(× 103 nm3)
Rabbit
Tissue CFD 4.29 ± 0.46 0.97 ± 0.11 45.9 ± 4.3 588 ± 58
Cells CFD 4.45 ± 0.48 0.81 ± 0.07 40.1 ± 3.2 400 ± 28⁎⁎
Cells HPF 3.97 ± 0.44 2.27 ± 0.22⁎⁎⁎ 42.3 ± 3.8 355 ± 30⁎⁎⁎



Mouse
Tissue CFD 4.27 ± 0.46 1.2 ± 0.14 34.14 ± 3.4 270 ± 35
Cells HPF 4.09 ± 0.43 2.67 ± 0.17⁎⁎⁎ 45.63 ± 4.9* 304 ± 32

Dyad defined as space of jSR-TT apposition of ≤20 nm; ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 vs tissue CFD; †p < 0.001 vs cells CFD; one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-hoc test (rabbit), Student's t-test (mouse); n = 20 TT-jSR pairs/ 16–20 cells/ 3 hearts (rabbit); n = 21–23 TT-jSR pairs/ 14–21 cells/ 3 hearts (mouse).